Brunswick District results
Elected member
READ, Tim
Australian Greens
Recheck votes
-
Total enrolment as at close of rolls:
52263
-
Formal votes:
43445
-
Informal votes:
1733 (3.84% of the total votes)
-
Total votes:
45178 (86.44% of the total enrolment as at the close of rolls)
Recheck first preference votes
| Candidate | Party | 1st pref. votes | % votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| HELOU, Anthony | 551 | 1.27% | |
| WILLIAMS, Mike | Australian Labor Party - Victorian Branch | 12392 | 28.52% |
| JIMENEZ, Nahui | Victorian Socialists | 3506 | 8.07% |
| EVANS, Shea | Fiona Patten's Reason Party | 1933 | 4.45% |
| SHAKER, Lilian Sabry | Family First Victoria | 529 | 1.22% |
| NGUYEN, Minh Quan | Liberal | 4723 | 10.87% |
| LAMARCHE-BEAUCHESNE, Rachel | Animal Justice Party | 699 | 1.61% |
| TAYLOR, Kenneth Charles | 153 | 0.35% | |
| READ, Tim | Australian Greens | 18959 | 43.64% |
Primary results for Brunswick District (Excel)
Results after distribution of preferences
| Candidate | Party | Votes after distribution | % votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| WILLIAMS, Mike | Australian Labor Party - Victorian Branch | 13854 | 31.89% |
| NGUYEN, Minh Quan | Liberal | 5632 | 12.96% |
| READ, Tim | Australian Greens | 23959 | 55.15% |
Two candidate preferred vote
Two candidate preferred results by voting centre
The two-candidate preferred count is intended to provide an early indication of election results but has no status in determining the actual election outcome. Minor variations may be observed with rechecked results and the preference distribution.
Learn more about the two-candidate preferred count (video).
Please note the two-candidate preferred (2CP) count has been superseded by the preference distribution for this district. You can see still view the 2CP results by voting centre by following the link above.
Two party preferred vote
| Party | Candidate | Preferred votes | % of preferred votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | NGUYEN, Minh Quan | 6927 | 15.94% |
| Australian Labor Party - Victorian Branch | WILLIAMS, Mike | 36518 | 84.06% |
Full preference distribution
This district would normally not require a full preference distribution because the elected candidate achieved an absolute majority before all or any preferences were distributed. In 2023, we conducted an indicative full preference distribution for information and statistical purposes.